On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 12:54 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 6:10 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 7:25 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> I have looked for now at the first patch and finished with the >>> attached while looking at it. Perhaps a committer could look already >>> at that? >> >> It looks fine to me except that I think we should spell out "param" as >> "parameter" throughout, instead of abbreviating. > > Fine for me. I have updated the first patch as attached (still looking > at the second).
Committed. I was on the fence about whether to back-patch this considering how close we are to release, but ended up deciding to go for it. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
