On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > Again. Unless I miss something that was solved in > www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20130615102028.gk19...@alap2.anarazel.de > > Personally I think we should add lz4 and maybe on strongly compressing > algorithm and be done with it. Runtime extensibility will make this much > more complicated, and I doubt it's worth the complexity.
+1, at the end we are going to have the same conclusion as for FPW compression when we discussed that, let's just switch to something that is less CPU-consuming than pglz, and lz4 is a good candidate for that. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
