Hi, thanks for the review.

> 1) (nitpicking) There seem to be some minor whitespace issues, i.e.
>   trailing spaces, empty lines being added/removed, etc.


Fixed, I think

> 2) one of the regression tests started to fail
> 
>   SELECT '-1e-700'::cube AS cube;
> 
>   This used to return (0) but now I get (-0).

Actually that problem emerged because of the first problem. I had extra 
whitespace in sql file and removed that whitespace from one of the answers file 
(cube_1.sql), so diff with both cube.sql and cube_1.sql was one line length and 
you saw diff with cube.sql. 
In all systems that available to me (osx/linux/freebsd) I saw that right 
answers file is cube_1.sql. But in other OS’es you can get +/- 0 or e27/e027. I 
edited that answers files manually, so there probably can be some other typos.

> 3) I wonder why the docs were changed like this:
> 
>   <para>
> -   It does not matter which order the opposite corners of a cube are
> -   entered in.  The <type>cube</> functions
> -   automatically swap values if needed to create a uniform
> -   <quote>lower left &mdash; upper right</> internal representation.
> +   When corners coincide cube stores only one corner along with a
>    special flag in order to reduce size wasted.
>   </para>
> 
>   Was the old behavior removed? I don't think so - it seems to behave
>   as before, so why to remove this information? Maybe it's not useful?
>   But then why add the bit about optimizing storage of points?

I’ve edited it because the statement was mislead (or at least ambiguous) — 
cube_in function doesn’t swap coordinates. 
Simple way to see it:
> select '(1,3),(3,1)'::cube;
     cube      
---------------
 (1, 3),(3, 1)

But LowerLeft-UpperRight representation should be (1,1),(3,3)


Updated patch attached.


Attachment: cube_distances.patch
Description: Binary data



> On 15 Dec 2015, at 21:46, Tomas Vondra <tomas.von...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 12/07/2015 03:47 PM, Stas Kelvich wrote:
>> Hello, fixed.
> 
> I've looked at the patch today, seems mostly fine to me.
> 
> Three comments though:
> 
> 1) (nitpicking) There seem to be some minor whitespace issues, i.e.
>   trailing spaces, empty lines being added/removed, etc.
> 
> 2) one of the regression tests started to fail
> 
>   SELECT '-1e-700'::cube AS cube;
> 
>   This used to return (0) but now I get (-0). As this query existed in
>   1.0, it's probably due to change in the C code. Now sure where.
> 
> 3) I wonder why the docs were changed like this:
> 
>   <para>
> -   It does not matter which order the opposite corners of a cube are
> -   entered in.  The <type>cube</> functions
> -   automatically swap values if needed to create a uniform
> -   <quote>lower left &mdash; upper right</> internal representation.
> +   When corners coincide cube stores only one corner along with a
>    special flag in order to reduce size wasted.
>   </para>
> 
>   Was the old behavior removed? I don't think so - it seems to behave
>   as before, so why to remove this information? Maybe it's not useful?
>   But then why add the bit about optimizing storage of points?
> 
> regards
> 
> --
> Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
> 
> 
> -- 
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to