Hello, I think I found a typo in a comment of syncrep.c.

>   * acknowledge the commit nor raise ERROR or FATAL.  The latter would
> - * lead the client to believe that that the transaction aborted, which
>   * is not true: it's already committed locally. The former is no good

The 'that' looks duplicate. And it might be better to put a
be-verb before the 'aborted'.

> + * lead the client to believe that the transaction is aborted, which

regards,

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
>From 6eb92736d318f6be35459d4406585aa34233bd5d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 16:52:19 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] fix typo of syncrep.c

---
 src/backend/replication/syncrep.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/syncrep.c b/src/backend/replication/syncrep.c
index 325239d..98f7d73 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/syncrep.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/syncrep.c
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ SyncRepWaitForLSN(XLogRecPtr XactCommitLSN)
 		/*
 		 * If a wait for synchronous replication is pending, we can neither
 		 * acknowledge the commit nor raise ERROR or FATAL.  The latter would
-		 * lead the client to believe that that the transaction aborted, which
+		 * lead the client to believe that the transaction is aborted, which
 		 * is not true: it's already committed locally. The former is no good
 		 * either: the client has requested synchronous replication, and is
 		 * entitled to assume that an acknowledged commit is also replicated,
-- 
1.8.3.1

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to