On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 10:31 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > On 2015-12-12 12:52:21 +0100, Andres Freund wrote: >> On 2015-12-12 20:49:52 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >> > Should we consider this bug a 9.5 blocker? >> >> I don't think so. But either way, I'm right now working on getting it >> fixed anyway. > > And done. Took a bit longer than predicted - I had to adjust my test > scripts to cope with < 9.4 not having tablespace mapping. Rather > annoying.
Thanks! Cool to see this thread finally addressed. > It'd be really convenient if tablespaces relative to the main data > directory were supported... I got bitten at some point as well by the fact that tablespaces created after a base backup is taken have their location map to the same point for a master and a standby :) -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
