These two tab completion pieces look strange to me:
/* If we have CREATE|UNIQUE INDEX <sth> CONCURRENTLY, then add "ON" */
else if ((pg_strcasecmp(prev3_wd, "INDEX") == 0 ||
pg_strcasecmp(prev2_wd, "INDEX") == 0) &&
pg_strcasecmp(prev_wd, "CONCURRENTLY") == 0)
COMPLETE_WITH_CONST("ON");
/* If we have CREATE|UNIQUE INDEX <sth>, then add "ON" or "CONCURRENTLY" */
else if ((pg_strcasecmp(prev3_wd, "CREATE") == 0 ||
pg_strcasecmp(prev3_wd, "UNIQUE") == 0) &&
pg_strcasecmp(prev2_wd, "INDEX") == 0)
{
static const char *const list_CREATE_INDEX[] =
{"CONCURRENTLY", "ON", NULL};
COMPLETE_WITH_LIST(list_CREATE_INDEX);
}
They appear to support a syntax along the lines of
CREATE INDEX name CONCURRENTLY
which is not the actual syntax.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
