On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 11:05:47AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> > * Foreign join pushdown vs EvalPlanQual >> > >> > Is this fixed by 5fc4c26db? If not, what remains to do? >> >> Unfortunately, no. That commit allows FDWs to do proper EPQ handling >> for plain table scans, but it proves to be inadequate for EPQ handling >> for joins. Solving that problem will require another patch, and, >> modulo a bunch of cosmetic issues, I'm reasonably happy with KaiGai >> Kohei's latest submission. I'll respond in more detail on that >> thread, but the question I want to raise here is: do we want to >> back-patch those changes to 9.5 at this late date? > > Yes. If 9.5 added a bad interface, better to fix the interface even now than > to live with the bad one.
OK, I've pushed the latest patch for that issue to master and 9.5. I'm not completely positive we've killed this problem dead, but I hope so. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
