Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane writes: >> Quite awhile back, we had a discussion about removing "$" from the set >> of allowed characters in operator names, and instead allowing it as a >> non-first character in identifiers.
> I agree with the first one, but does it have to imply the second? It does not have to, but then we'd only be using "$" for parameters, which seems like we're not getting our money's worth out of the character (pun intended). Also, the original point of that discussion was that Oracle allows "$" in identifiers, and people wanted to port Oracle code without having to rename their stuff. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org