I've recently noticed W-TinyLfu cache admission policy (see [1]) being used for caffeine "high performance caching library for Java 8". It demonstrates high cache hit ratios (see [2]) and enables to build high-throughput caches (see caffeine in [3]) Authors explicitly allow implementations of the algorithm (see [4]).
Does it make sense to evaluate the algorithm for buffer replacement? [1]: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1512.00727v1.pdf [2]: https://github.com/ben-manes/caffeine/wiki/Efficiency [3]: https://github.com/ben-manes/caffeine/wiki/Benchmarks [4]: https://github.com/ben-manes/caffeine/issues/23#issuecomment-161536706 Vladimir Sitnikov -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
