On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 06:40:09PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> Bruce Momjian wrote: >> >> > Do we still have licensing issues if we ship Postgres and OpenSSL >> > together? >> >> See >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20150801151410.GA28344%40awork2.anarazel.de > > True, but the current license is unchanged and has the advertising > clause, which I think we have to honor if we ship OpenSSL: > > https://www.openssl.org/source/license.html > > I assume Windows has to ship OpenSSL with the installer and has to abide > by this, for example. OSX might have to do the same. It might be good > to see what we do for Windows packages.
We already do it for all our installers - Windows, OSX and Linux. We have to, otherwise we wouldn't be able to ensure the same binaries would run on all the different supported versions. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
