On 11/26/2015 09:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Stefan Kaltenbrunner <ste...@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes: >> that seems entirely doable with our current infrastructure (and even >> with minimal-to-no hackery on mj2) - but it still carries the "changes >> From:" issue :/ > > Yeah. What do you think of the other approach of trying to preserve > validity of the incoming DKIM-Signature (in particular, by not changing > the Subject or message body)?
well not changing the subject seems like something we could do without fuss - not changing the body would likely mean we would (again) get a number of people asking "how do I unsubscribe", but maybe we will have to live with that. As for google/gmail - it seems they are indeed moving towards p=reject based on: https://dmarc.org/2015/10/global-mailbox-providers-deploying-dmarc-to-protect-users/ https://wordtothewise.com/2015/10/dmarc-news-gmail-preject-and-arc/ so we have to do "something" anyway (before June 2016) - I have not actually studied the referenced ietf drafts mentioned in the second post yet so maybe there is something in there to help with our usecase... Stefan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
