On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> wrote: > On 17 November 2015 at 20:08, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 4:26 AM, Thom Brown <t...@linux.com> wrote: >> >>> However, the first parallel seq scan shows it getting 170314 rows. >>> Another run shows it getting 194165 rows. The final result is >>> correct, but as you can see from the rows on the Append node (59094295 >>> rows), it doesn't match the number of rows on the Gather node >>> (30000000). >> >> Is this the same issue reported in >> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFj8pRBF-i=qdg9b5nzrxyfchzbezwmthxyphidqvwomojh...@mail.gmail.com >> and not yet fixed? I am inclined to think it probably is. > > Yes, that seems to be the same issue.
I've committed a fix for that issue now, so you shouldn't see it any more if you retest this patch. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
