On 11/16/15 5:10 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: >> On 11/15/15 9:50 PM, Craig Ringer wrote: >>> I'd prefer to omit fields if explicitly assigned to NULL. You can always >>> use coalesce if you want the string 'NULL'; I agree with others here >>> that the vast majority of users will want the field just omitted. > >> I think the problem was that you can't omit the primary message. > > If you ask me, that would be a feature not a bug.
Right. Frankly, I have lost track of what the problem here is. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
