On 11/15/15 9:53 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > I suggest you review the original thread on this subject before a line > was ever written. "multiple" (see subject line on this whole thread) is > clearly what is being asked for. Making people turn that into a single > argument is not what was envisaged. See for example Pavel's original > example involving use of xargs where that's clearly not at all easy.
I can see (small) value in having a new option that is like -c but interprets the string as a fully-featured script like -f. (Small because the same behavior can already be had with here strings in bash.) The behavior should be exactly like -f, including all the behavior with single-transaction and single-step modes or whatever. But then I will point out that we currently don't handle multiple -f options. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
