<gavinflo...@archidevsys.co.nz> wrote: > > More knowledgeable people are sure to reply in more detail! > > However, they would probably appreciate it if you can run with 9.4.5 > (the latest released version). Running it with the beta of 9.5 would be > a bonus! > > Note that I don't know enough to say for sure that later versions would > make any difference in this case, but at least using later later > versions would kill lots of Red Herrings! :-) >
Difference between minor versions does not matter in this case. I confirmed the cost calculation logic regarding this problem was not changed between Postgres 9.4.1 and 9.4.5. I heard there are some performance improvements on 9.5. It might change something regarding this problem. so I will try these queries on 9.5! Thanks Ryoji -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
