On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Kevin Grittner <kgri...@ymail.com> wrote: > Has anyone taken a close look at what happens if the two sides of > the merge join have different implementations of the same collation > name? Is there anything we should do to defend against the > problem?
The issue of FDWs vs. collations has been thought about to some degree (see FDW_COLLATE_NONE/SAFE/UNSAFE), but I don't quite understand that stuff in detail. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
