On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Haribabu Kommi <kommi.harib...@gmail.com> wrote: > I marked this patch as ready for committer.
The patch says: If a background worker registers to receive asynchronous notifications with the <command>LISTEN</command> through <acronym>SPI</acronym>, there is currently no way for incoming notifications to be received. But wouldn't it be more correct to say: If a background worker registers to receive asynchronous notifications with the <command>LISTEN</command> through <acronym>SPI</acronym>, the worker will log those notifications, but there is no programmatic way for the worker to intercept and respond to those notifications. Or something like that? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
