Larry Rosenman wrote: > > No one has offered any scenario in which it's important to bind to only > > v4 or only v6 addresses when both are present. In the absence of a > > compelling argument why that would be useful, I do not see why we're > > worrying. My own thought is that if I wanted to constrain PG to bind > > to a subset of a machine's addresses, the extension I'd want is to allow > > virtual_host to contain a list of names or IP addresses --- of either > > version. Basing it on v4 versus v6 has no payback that I can see. > > Please make sure that you can handle the situation of a IPv6 API, but no > IPv6 > stack. (E.G. UnixWare up to at least 7.1.3).
Already done. My BSD/OS is that way in the default kernel configuration too. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
