Oleg Bartunov wrote: > me too, but I have to mention one problem we should have in mind - it's > independency from political games (sanctions). Think about developers from > Russia, who one day may be blocked by Github, for example.
That's a very good point. I think Github and other sites are already blocked in countries like India and Cuba. This becomes more pressing as commercial entities are formed in countries like Russia. Surely we do not want PostgresPro developers to be unable to interact with our bugtracker ... We've done an excellent job of keeping our servers far away from any individual jurisdictions, going back many years ago when Marc Fournier decided to host our stuff in Panama for precisely this reason. Nowadays for us it is reasonably simple to move stuff around in case there's trouble in any particular country. I have a very hard time believing we would tie ourselves down for a bug tracker; hosting whatever in our own infrastructure is probably the only reasonable option for us at this point. As Tom said, lesser projects cannot afford this luxury, but we're not giving that away in a jiffy. IANAL -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
