On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> There is a long tradition of systematically failing to tag releases in
> >> this project. Don't expect it to improve.
>
> > It was I who suggested that a release team would be a good idea.
>
> We *have* a release team. Your problem is that Marc, who is the man who
> would need to do this, doesn't appear to consider it an important thing
> to do. Try to convince him to put it on his checklist.
I never considered tag'ng for minor releases as having any importance,
since the tarball's themselves provide the 'tag' ... branches give us the
ability to back-patch, but tag's don't provide us anything ... do they?
That said, I can back-tag the whole source tree for past releases if ppl
do think it is important, its just a matter of knowing the 'timestamp' to
base it on, which I can do based on the dates of the tar files ...
Its not like tag'ng is hard to do ...
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
