* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes:
> > Are there any objections to pginfra standing up bugs.postgresql.org with
> > debbugs?  Obviously, it'd be more-or-less beta as we play with it, and
> > we could set it up as beta-bugs.p.o, if there's concern about that.
> 
> I agree with the idea that we don't yet want to give the impression that
> this is the official bug tracker.  However, "beta-bugs" could give the
> impression that it was specifically for bugs about 9.5beta, without
> dispelling the idea that it is official.  Maybe "bugs-test.p.o"?

Works for me.

> (But let's not spend too much time bikeshedding the site name.)

Agreed.

Thanks!

Stephen

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to