Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> Also, it's not like this change couldn't be UN-done at a future point.
> I mean, Tom didn't like the flag I added aesthetically, but if we
> needed it, we could have it. Or we could engineer something else.
For the record: that's true for the patch you just committed. But once
I remove the hopefully-now-dead planner support for recomputing opfuncid,
it would get a lot more painful to reverse the decision.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
