On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > As mentioned previously [1], we have to do two different things to make > this work, Robert seems to have taken care of one of those (basically > second point in mail[1]) and still another one needs to be taken care > which is to provide support of reading subplans in readfuncs.c and that > will solve the problem you are seeing now.
Thanks for the information. During my test, I saw a plan change from parallel seq scan to seq scan for the first reported query. So I thought that all scenarios are corrected as not to generate the parallel seq scan. Regards, Hari Babu Fujitsu Australia -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
