On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 09:40:10AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Alvaro Herrera > > <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > > Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote: > > > > > >> Why this patch was reverted one day after applied [1]? I didn't see > any > > >> discussion around it. > > > > > > Contributors whose patches are getting committed should really > subscribe > > > to pgsql-committers. > > > > I would have thought discussion of committed patches should be moved > > to -hackers. > > I agree, but it happens anyway quite frequently. Since recently, I make > a point of changing the CC from -committers to -hackers, but due to > force of habit I often forget. > > > Noted. I usually don't do that.
I am thinking we should all agree if we should redirect commit comments to hackers, or not, so we are consistent. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + Everyone has their own god. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
