Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>wrote:
>> On reflection I think that the tracking of activeSubid in my patch is
>> probably overkill if we're attacking it this way. We can just have
>> AtSubAbort_Portals fail any ACTIVE portal regardless of subxact level,
>> which is pretty analogous to what AtAbort_Portals has done for a long
>> time.
> Tracking the activated subxact looked neat from my side, that's more
> consistent with what is done when the portal is marked as ready,
> particularly with the new routine introduced.
Actually, that idea did not work at all: it caused errors inside plpgsql
EXCEPT blocks to try to kill the portal running the outer function call.
Ooops.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
