On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Alexander Korotkov < a.korot...@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Mason S <masonli...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>> We also a bit disappointed by Huawei position about CSN patch, we hoped >>> to use for our XTM. >>> >> >> Disappointed in what way? Moving to some sort of CSN approach seems to >> open things up for different future ideas. In the short term, it would mean >> replacing potentially large snapshots and longer visibility checks. In the >> long term, perhaps CSN could help simplify the design of multi-master >> replication schemes. >> > > We are disappointed because at PGCon talk Huawei announced publishing of > their CSN patch and further work in this direction together with community. > However, it's even not published yet despite all the promises. Nobody from > Huawei answers CSN thread in the hackers. > So, I think we got nothing from Huawei except teasing and should rely only > on ourselves. That is disappointing. > > Oh, I see. I was in contact with some of the folks involved a few weeks ago. The intention is to do a bit more work on the patch and then post it. This should be happening "soon". Thanks, Mason
