On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq.postg...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> >> After looking at the code a bit, IMO the most reasonable thing to do is to >> include this transformation in inline_set_returning_functions(), perhaps >> renaming it to something like inline_srfs_and_ctes(). >> > > This is essentially the same as my current implementation (revised > patch attached): >
I tried the method as Tom suggested (attached in previous email) but still got the same issue - anybody see what I did wrong here? :-( Thanks, Qingqing -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
