On August 25, 2015 08:36:52 PM Tom Lane wrote: > Jan de Visser <j...@de-visser.net> writes: > > On August 25, 2015 09:31:35 PM Michael Paquier wrote: > >> This patch had feedback, but there has been no update in the last > >> month, so I am now marking it as returned with feedback. > > > > It was suggested that this mechanism became superfluous with the inclusion > > of the view postgresql.conf (pg_settings?) in 9.5. I left it to Tom > > (being the one that suggested the feature) to indicate if he still thinks > > it's useful. > I think there's still a fair argument for "pg_ctl reload" being able to > return a simple yes-or-no result. We had talked about trying to shoehorn > textual error messages into the protocol, and I'm now feeling that that > complication isn't needed, but a bare-bones feature would still be worth > the trouble IMO.
OK, I'll have a look at the review comments and submit something updated soon. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
