Joe Conway wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1
I should have gotten my key signed when I had the chance :-( > On 08/25/2015 11:28 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Joe Conway wrote: > > > >> Does anyone out there object to a non-backward compatible change > >> to pg_controldata output? > > > > I don't (and thanks for taking care of it), but as I recall, > > pg_upgrade reads and interprets pg_controldata output so it may > > need adjustment too. > > Thanks for the heads up. There are lots of controldata items > pg_upgrade is interested in, but AFAICS none of these are included. > Now maybe they should be, but they are not currently referenced. Well, if there's no compatibility hit then I don't think it's worth worrying about. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
