I wrote:
> Hmm ... what do you think of wording the error as "there is no label "foo"
> attached to any block enclosing this statement"? That still leaves the
> terminology "block" undefined, but it seems better than "any statement
> enclosing this statement".
Actually, looking at the plpgsql documentation, I see that it is
completely consistent about using the word "block" to refer to
[DECLARE]/BEGIN/END. So we probably can't get away with using the term in
a vaguer sense here. So the wording would have to be "there is no label
"foo" attached to any block or loop enclosing this statement". That's a
tad verbose, but at least it's clear ...
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
