On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Craig Ringer <cr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 7 July 2015 at 21:37, Julien Rouhaud <julien.rouh...@dalibo.com> wrote: > >> Well, I obviously missed that pg_srand48() is only used if the system >> lacks random/srandom, sorry for the noise. So yes, random() must be >> used instead of pg_lrand48(). >> >> I'm attaching a new version of the patch fixing this issue just in case. > > Thanks for picking this up. I've been trying to find time to come back > to it but been swamped in priority work.
For now I am marking that as returned with feedback. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
