On 08/23/2015 08:58 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
2) No docs or related regression test yet. I will do that if there is
enough interest in this getting committed. So far no one except Andrew
and I have chimed in.
I think that's a good thing to have, now I have concerns about making
this data readable for non-superusers. Cloud deployments of Postgres
are logically going to block the access of this view.


I don't think it exposes any information of great security value.

+ Datum pg_config(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS);
+
+ PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1(pg_config);

The declaration of the function is not needed, PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1
takes care of it.



Umm, we shouldn't be using PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1 in backend code at all, IIRC.

cheers

andrew



--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to