scott.marlowe wrote: > On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Philip Warner wrote: > > > At 10:49 PM 18/12/2002 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > >I don't think we can bump that up in a minor. > > > > Why not? It's a relatively serious problem with the default config. > > > > > > >Should we? > > > > Yes. > > I concur. The problems of a too-low fsm setting are serious, and I can't > see setting fsm to 1000 creating problems for anyone. That's actually > still a pretty low number for production servers.
OK, I agree it should be bumped up, but the issue is whether to do that in a minor release. It will increase shared memory by 36k. Is that safe in a beta? Tom, Mr. FSM, can you comment? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
