On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 09:57:52AM -0700, Joe Conway wrote: > On 08/03/2015 09:55 AM, Stephen Frost wrote: > > * Noah Misch (n...@leadboat.com) wrote: > >> On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 11:31:16PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >>> That being the case, it would probably be a good idea to get > >>> them done before alpha2, as there may not be a good opportunity > >>> afterwards. > >> > >> Freedom to bump catversion after alpha2 will be > >> barely-distinguishable from freedom to do so now. I have planned > >> to leave my usual comment period of a few days, though skipping > >> that would be rather innocuous in this case. > > > > This is clearly necessary, of course, and I wouldn't be surprised > > if we have another necessary bump post-alpha2, but at the same > > time, it'd certainly be nice if we are able to put out alpha2 and > > then a beta1 in the future without needing to do a bump. > > > > In other words, +1 from me for going ahead and committing this for > > alpha2, if possible. > > +1
Rather than commit on an emergency basis in the few hours between these +1's and the wrap, I kept to my original schedule. FYI, if it hadn't required emergency procedures (cancelling the day's plans so I could get to a notebook computer), I would have committed early based on the three +1s. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
