On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > On 7/22/15 4:45 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >> But it seemed to me that this could be rather confusing. I thought it >> would be better to be explicit about whether the protections are >> enabled in all cases. That way, (1) if you see the message saying >> they are enabled, they are enabled; (2) if you see the message saying >> they are disabled, they are disabled; and (3) if you see neither >> message, your version does not have those protections. > > But this is not documented, AFAICT, so I don't think anyone is going to > be able to follow that logic. I don't see anything in the release notes > saying, look for this message to see how this applies to you, or whatever.
Good point. I can't tell you what the right thing to do is, and I'm sure there is room for debate about that. I'm only telling you why I did what I did. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
