Shulgin, Oleksandr wrote:
> On Jul 17, 2015 4:31 PM, "Andrew Dunstan" <and...@dunslane.net> wrote:

> > Incidentally, this doesn't look acceptable anyway:
> >>
> >> !  es->json_cxt.value(&es->json_cxt, num, JSONTYPE_NUMERIC,
> >> !  NUMERICOID, 1702 /* numeric_out */);
> >
> > We don't hardcode function oids elsewhere. So this is also something that
> > makes the patch unacceptable.
> 
> Well, good to know (I believe I've asked about this in the first mail
> specifically).
> 
> Is there any way a built-in function oid would change/differ on different
> server versions? What would be the recommended way to do this?

C'mon, that's a trivial problem.  Just use getTypeOutputInfo();
numeric's OID is hardcoded as NUMERICOID.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to