[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > It is asynchronous without the need of 2 phase commit. It is group > > communication based and requires the group communication system to > > guarantee total order. The tricky part is, that the local transaction > > must be on hold until the own commit message comes back without a prior > > No, It holds until it's own Writeset comes back. Commits > and then send a commit message on the simple channel, so > commits don't wait for ordered writesets.
Darren, can you clarify this? Why does it send that message? How does it allow commits not to wait for ordered writesets? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
