In summary, the X^1.5 correction seems to work pretty well. It doesn't
completely eliminate the problem, but it makes it a lot better.

I've looked at the maths.

I think that the load is distributed as the derivative of this function, that is (1.5 * x ** 0.5): It starts at 0 but very quicky reaches 0.5, it pass the 1.0 (average load) around 40% progress, and ends up at 1.5, that is the finishing load is 1.5 the average load, just before fsyncing files. This looks like a recipee for a bad time: I would say this is too large an overload. I would suggest a much lower value, say around 1.1...

The other issue with this function is that it should only degrade performance by disrupting the write distribution if someone has WAL on a different disk. As I understand it this thing does only make sense if the WAL & the data are on the samee disk. This really suggest a guc.

I have ran some tests with this patch and the detailed results of the runs are attached with this mail.

I do not understand really the aggregated figures in the files attached.

I guess that maybe between "end" markers there is a summary of figures collected for 28 backends over 300-second runs (?), but I do not know what the min/max/avg/sum/count figures are about.

I thought the patch should show difference if I keep max_wal_size to somewhat lower or moderate value so that checkpoint should get triggered due to wal size, but I am not seeing any major difference in the writes spreading.

I'm not sure I understand your point. I would say that at full speed pgbench the disk is always busy writing as much as possible, either checkpoint writes or wal writes, so the write load as such should not be that different anyway?

I understood that the point of the patch is to check whether there is a tps dip or not when the checkpoint begins, but I'm not sure how this can be infered from the many aggregated data you sent, and from my recent tests the tps is very variable anyway on HDD.

--
Fabien.


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to