Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2 July 2015 at 14:08, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinn...@iki.fi> wrote:
>> I'm marking this as "returned with feedback" in the commitfest.
> There are no unresolved issues with the approach, nor is it true it is
> slower. If you think there are some, you should say what they are, not act
> high handedly to reject a patch without reason.
Have you read the thread? There were plenty of objections, as well as
a design for a better solution. In addition, we should think about
more holistic solutions such as Andres' nearby proposal (which I doubt
will work as-is, but maybe somebody will think of how to fix it).
Committing a band-aid will just make it harder to pursue real fixes.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
