On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2015-06-24 16:41:48 +0200, Andres Freund wrote: > > I, by now, have come to a different conclusion. I think it's time to > > entirely drop the renegotiation support. > > I think by now we essentially concluded that we should do that. What I'm > not sure yet is how: Do we want to rip it out in master and just change > the default in the backbranches, or do we want to rip it out in all > branches and leave a faux guc in place in the back branches. I vote for > the latter, but would be ok with both variants. > > 3. Change the "default" and make the guc impotent - in the back branches. Its minimally invasive and accomplishes the same user-facing goal as "ripping it out". Leaving dead code around in master seems undesirable so ripping it out from there would still make sense. This does provide an easy fall-back in the back-branches if we are accused of being overly parental. David J.
