On 06/11/2015 05:08 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: >>> JoshB: Advocacy. There is a strong argument that does not need to be a >>> core position. >>> >> >> I strongly disagree with this. On the contrary, I think there is a very good >> argument that FOR such a position in core. > > +1.
FYI, what do I mostly for Core is: a) Press Relations b) Corporate Relations Both of those need to be handled by a core team member, because they often fall under the "confidential contact" portion of Core's duties, or require nonpublic knowledge of things like security releases. I agree that general advocacy can certainly be handled outside core, and should be -- and, for that matter, is. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
