On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: >> Now that we (EnterpriseDB) have this 8-socket machine, maybe we could >> try your patch there, bound to varying numbers of sockets. > > It'd be a significant amount of work to rebase it ontop current HEAD. I > guess the easiest thing would be to try an older version of the patch > with the xadd in place, and use a tree from back then.
We could do that, I guess. But we've made other significant improvements in the meantime, so... -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
