Rod Taylor kirjutas T, 10.12.2002 kell 01:49: > Below is a short list of TODOs on sequences I wish to tackle over the > next week. ... > Ok, this is where it gets confusing. Right now setval() is implemented > in such a manner that it cannot be rolled back (see SETVAL NOTE below), > but I'd like ALTER SEQUENCE to be transaction safe.
All *val('seqname') functions are transaction-unsafe, i.e. live outside transactions. Why would you want alter transaction to be transaction safe ? -- Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster