On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> I'm personally kind of astonished that we're even thinking about beta >> so soon. I mean, we at least need to go through the stuff listed >> here, I think: >> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items > > Well, maybe we ought to call it an alpha not a beta, but I think we ought > to put out some kind of release that we can encourage people to test. > What you are suggesting is that we serialize resolution of the known > issues with discovery of new issues, and that's not an efficient use of > time. Especially seeing that we're approaching the summer season where > we won't get much input at all.
Well, I think we ought to take at least a few weeks to try to do a bit of code review and clean up what we can from the open items list. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
