On 2015-05-25 09:12:35 +0200, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > On 05/25/2015 03:17 AM, Andres Freund wrote: > > On 2015-05-24 21:01:54 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > >> Yes, but it wasn't running these tests until a few days ago when its > >> buildfarm software was upgraded. > > > > But barriers are used in other places too... > > fwiw: spoonbill just failed in the same part of the regression tests > (and it is a Sparc64 box though not running solaris): > > > http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=spoonbill&dt=2015-05-24%2023%3A00%3A07
With a quite different error though: PANIC: ERRORDATA_STACK_SIZE exceeded Hm. So we have a *occasional* stack size exceeded failure and an occasional spinlock error in test_shm_mq. I'm inclined to think that this is a shm_mq problem, and not a more general locking problem - it seems likely, but not guaranteed, that that'd have materialized elsewhere. Robert: IIRC there was some problems with shm_mq tests being stuck before, right? Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
