On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 12:24:03PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Andrew Gierth
> <and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk> wrote:
> >>>>>> "David" == David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> writes:
> >
> > David> How about a more sensible data structure as a PG-specific addon.
> > David> GROUPING_JSON() seems like just the thing.
> >
> > What exactly do you think it should return?
>
> I vote for { "rube" : "goldberg" }.
Your point is well taken. I had { "target_list_name" : false, ... }
How about GROUPING_BYTEA()?
Also is there a really great reason that bitwise operations don't work
on NUMERIC? Lack of tuits is a good reason, but not, it seems to me,
a great one.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
