Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: >> On 2015-05-19 11:34:49 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >>> There are many remaining open items.
>> At least on https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items >> there not really that many? > On top of those items, many patches and features (I mean a lot!) have > been committed just before the feature freeze deadline. I would think > that those things should be looked at a second time by extra eyes. Yes. We desperately need to spend time on reviewing the stuff that got crammed in at the last minute --- I think we'd be fools to assume that there aren't a lot of bugs there. I think if we spend the next month reviewing what's already in, we could ship a credible beta before PGCon. And then maybe we could start 9.6 development on 1 July, only a couple weeks late. But if we start focusing on 9.6 development right now, which is what some current threads seem to be after, 9.5 is going to be a disaster. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
