Andres Freund wrote: > On 2015-05-18 14:13:51 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Hmm, AFAICS the problematic check was introduced by this commit: > > > > commit 9f1e051adefb2f29e757cf426b03db20d3f8a26d > > Author: Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> > > Date: Fri Nov 29 11:26:41 2013 -0300 > > > > so it isn't hot off the oven, but it is a regression. > > Hasn't that just changed the symptoms? I don't recall exactly, but my > recollection is that the multixact code isn't ready at that point and > hasn't initialized a bunch of important variables yet. Leading to errors > in the SLRU etc.
Not sure about that. The page limits etc aren't set yet so you can't create new multis, nor truncate appropriately, but just reading one should have worked. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
