On 2015-05-13 20:48:51 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I still think that going back to defining the second byte as the size > would be better. Fortunately, since this is only a matter of in-memory > representations, we aren't committed to any particular answer.
Requiring sizes to be different still strikes me as a disaster. Or is that not what you're proposing? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
