* Bruce Momjian (br...@momjian.us) wrote: > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 11:19:29AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 10:32:03AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > > > We also need to start thinking about what happens after feature > > > freeze. The CommitFest application currently lists a 2015-06 > > > CommitFest which, according to previous practice, would be expected to > > > start on the 15th of the month. Given where we are now, that seems > > > entirely unrealistic. I am doubtful that we will be ready to ship a > > > beta by mid-June, let alone begin a new development cycle. > > > > This is a very good analysis. I have been holding back my trivial new > > patches for 9.6 in hopes of setting a good example. However, all my > > stuff is new, while many of these other patches have waited their turn > > for review, and we are going to be unfair to submitters if we don't give > > them the attention they deserve --- that is always the tension we have > > at this time. > > > > We have three days left so I think we need committers to devote serious > > time, if possible, to helping us resolve as much as we can. If we start > > thinking about this on Friday, it is too late. > > Let me put a finer point on this --- whatever gets pushed to 9.6 > unreasonably will be a feature we don't have in 9.5 and will discourage > future development. I know we can't do magic, but now is the time to > try.
I certainly agree with this and have been putting a fair bit of effort
into it over the past week. :/
More help would absolutely be appreciated.
Thanks!
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
